The events that together form the complex quasi-event (1) still unfolding on a lethal scale in what is known as "Cancer Alley" in the Mississippi river adjacent parishes of
Louisiana compound forces described as "environmental", "biopolitical" and "racial"; and framed and experienced through toxicity. This toxicity pertains to multiple "conditions with effects" that appear in affective encounters between a toxin and a human body, thanatos with bios (2), endogenous with exogenous, animate with inanimate. Rendering visible the trespass of inanimate toxins into animate spaces has helped to demonstrate the vulnerability of certain bodies because of the privileging of others (primarily white heterosexual cisgender male bodies) through the mechanisms of racial capitalism and led to important activist efforts to demand accountable action. However, the binaries of life/death, human/non-human inhibit an understanding of the more complex nature of these relations which depend upon a rhetoric of war that must identify and illuminate a threat (Foucault, 1997). To attend to the extent which race as a biopolitical mechanism of capitalism actually unfolds differentially across bodies and groups (human and other-than) one must pry open the cleavage that opposes life and death, valuable life and bare life, and track extant socialities that separate, interpenetrate, and draw them close. One approach is through the queering of toxicity in the work of gender and disability scholar Mel Y. Chen who's consideration of the toxicity and iterate racialization of lead lends a rethinking of heteronormative and hegemonic ideas of what constitutes domesticity, internality, and subject-object relationality.
In Chen's article "Toxic Animacies, Inanimate Affections" (Chen, 2011) they discuss the biopolitical framework of immunity and how experiences of toxicity can lead (3) to renewed forms of relation with both humans and non-humans. This reframing does not reduce the acute and widespread suffering of humans but carefully demonstrates its disproportional presence among groups exposed through capital exploitation and draws attention to the racialization that occurs in connection with toxicity. Chen proposes a spectrum of relationality that begins with the toxic asset (lead), followed by bodies allowed to become toxic (bodies of color), and at the other end, assets to be protected from becoming toxic (white bodies) (Chen, 2011). These categories are distinguished by the biopolitical figure of immunity, following Haraway (Haraway, 2013) as a tool for distinguishing "us" from "them" that is never separable from the social and political cultures that construct "the immune system" as an internal, domestic concern to be protected from "foreign" threat born from the same apparatus that determines which immune systems are worth protecting. Chen draws a further parallel to the U.S. government's (lack of) response to the AIDS crisis based on the damning of queer intimacy as a perverse deviation from heteronormative practices that framed queer subjects as "responsible" for their exposure to an "external threat". The state sanctioned denial of a porosity or intimacy with the "otherwise" and the maintenance of the concept of "integrity" of the body, of the racial group, or the nation is an essential insight when considering toxicity.
The queered relations that Chen explores depart from an understanding of toxicity as between life and nonlife; the presence of a toxin alters life-ness and draws it toward inanimacy. This intimate relationship with non-life, its affective power, makes visible the "queer-inanimate socialities" that must be included when constructing the range of intra-acting, touching, and toxic intimacies that make up "the environment". Reading environmental disaster through the lens of racial-capitalism is an essential step in understanding the differential risks that are created and forced up on vulnerable groups. However, this reading must be supplemented with a new attention towards forms of relations that have either been rendered on too large a scale to be perceived (4) or/and been enclosed within a rhetoric of domination wherein deviant relations are toxic or terrorist while others are welcome and healthy(5). Extending the critical reading of race and environmental crises to account for queered and alter-relations opens up co-existence to examination and expansion. How might relation change if, amongst other bodies (animate and otherwise) we acknowledge our queer consumption of one another as we inhale each-other's cellular fragments. Once ingested, how can we reframe or resist how we are marked different and held apart?